Docket intelligence — April 2026

Active Mass Tort Dockets in 2025–2026: Which Campaigns Are Open, Closing, and Worth Entering Now

18 min read · Updated April 2026 · 2,300 words · 8 dockets assessed · 4 MDL phases explained

Docket status last verified: April 14, 2026. MDL case counts sourced from JPML data and LexGenius MDL tracker.

8
dockets assessed April 2026
3,490+
Depo-Provera cases — fastest growing
15,220
AFFF pending cases
1
docket closed — Camp Lejeune
Operator Note
March 2024. A managing partner in Illinois calls us. He wants Roundup leads. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Glyphosate exposure. He has a firm ready to take volume and a buyer willing to pay.

We told him the window was closing. Bayer had already paid $11 billion to settle 100,000 cases. The remaining 60,000+ pending cases were increasingly competitive to acquire. Per-lead prices had climbed 40% from their 2021 floor.

Three years earlier — 2021, when Roundup bellwether trials were establishing case values and law firms were building plaintiff inventories aggressively — the entry economics looked completely different. Lower per-lead cost. Less buyer competition.

He had waited too long. He asked what he should be in instead. We told him Depo-Provera.

That gap — between entering Roundup in 2021 versus entering it in 2024 — is the entire game in mass tort. Not which docket has the biggest case values. Which phase is the docket in, and are you early or late?

Here is exactly where the major dockets stand in April 2026. Read this before you spend a dollar.

01

The Framework Every Firm Gets Wrong: Docket Phase Determines Everything

Most law firms evaluate mass tort dockets by case value. Mesothelioma settles for $1M+. AFFF settles for $250K+. Roundup settles for $100K–$500K. They look at the expected fee, set a CPR target, and decide whether to enter.

That analysis is missing the only variable that actually controls the economics: which phase the docket is in.

The same docket produces radically different CPR depending on when you enter. Early Phase 2 Roundup in 2021: $2,200 CPR. Late Phase 3 Roundup in 2024: $7,000+ CPR. Same product liability claim. Same case values. Completely different acquisition economics — because buyer demand, lead supply, and vendor competition all compound over the MDL lifecycle.

Here is the framework. Call it The MDL Phase Ladder.

01
Phase 1 — Emerging
MDL consolidating or recently consolidated. Case values uncertain. Bellwether selection underway. Buyer demand building but not at scale. Entry cost: lowest. Risk: highest. This is where you build position before the market knows the docket is real.
02
Phase 2 — Peak Acquisition
Bellwether trials establishing case value ranges. Law firms aggressively building plaintiff inventories. Buyer demand at maximum. Entry cost rising but still viable. This is the highest-volume, most competitive phase — and the most profitable for operations that entered in Phase 1 or early Phase 2.
03
Phase 3 — Maturing
Plaintiff class increasingly aggregated. Settlement negotiations underway or imminent. Buyer demand shifting toward quality over volume. Firms becoming selective. Entry cost: highest. Late entrants get compressed CPR with no recovery path.
04
Phase 4 — Winding Down
Settlement framework established. Filing deadlines tightening. Buyer demand contracting. Per-lead prices falling because fewer firms are paying for new plaintiffs. Exit the campaign, don’t enter.

Every docket below is in one of these four phases. Your acquisition budget should match the phase — not the case value headline.

02

Where Every Major Docket Stands in April 2026

DocketPhaseStatusAction
Depo-ProveraPhase 2Peak acquisitionEnter now
AFFFPhase 2–3MonitorEnter with exit plan
Hair RelaxerPhase 2GrowingEnter
GLP-1/OzempicPhase 1–2EmergingEnter small
NEC FormulaPhase 2Pre-bellwetherEnter
MesotheliomaEvergreenAlways openEnter and stay
RoundupPhase 3MaturingDon’t enter fresh
Camp LejeunePhase 4CLOSEDDo not enter
Depo-ProveraPhase 2 — Enter Now

3,490 pending cases as of April 2026. Approximately 1,400 new filings in March 2026 alone — the fastest-growing MDL in federal mass tort by a wide margin.

Here is why this docket is the best entry point in the current market.

The March 2024 scientific study linking Depo-Provera to meningioma brain tumors created a mass discovery event. Millions of women who received injectable Depo-Provera over the years — and who had subsequently developed meningioma — suddenly had a fresh SOL window running from 2024 when they learned of the connection. That’s not a small plaintiff pool. It’s enormous. And most of it hasn’t been acquired yet.

The MDL consolidated in N.D. Florida under Judge Rodgers in 2025. Discovery concluded September 2025. Bellwether trial selection is underway. The docket is in peak Phase 2. Plaintiff inventories are still being built. Lead prices are $500 per lead. CPR on docket-specific leads runs $2,600–$3,300.

In 12–18 months, when bellwether verdicts establish settlement ranges and the plaintiff class is substantially aggregated, those numbers will be worse. Enter now.

What qualifies: Depo-Provera injection confirmed — not oral progesterone, not other brands. Meningioma brain tumor diagnosis specifically — not other brain tumors, not other diagnoses. Minimum use duration established. Not currently represented.
AFFFPhase 2–3 — Monitor

15,220 pending cases. Fifth-largest MDL in the country. Individual plaintiff cancer claims are the active acquisition target — municipal water system cases settled for $12 billion and are largely resolved.

AFFF grew 99% in 2025. The case values are real. PFAS-linked cancers — bladder, kidney, testicular, thyroid — command strong settlement ranges. The qualification criteria are tight enough that docket-specific leads produce low intake disqualification rates.

The complication: global settlement speculation has circulated since 2023. It hasn’t materialized. But if it does — if 3M, DuPont, and the other defendants announce a framework for individual plaintiff claims — the acquisition window closes in days, not weeks. Firms will immediately stop buying plaintiffs. Every lead you’ve ordered but haven’t received becomes worthless.

Enter AFFF now if you have active buyer relationships and a defined exit trigger. The trigger: any credible reporting of global individual plaintiff settlement negotiations. Not rumors. Named parties, named mediator, named framework. That’s when you stop.

What qualifies: AFFF firefighting foam exposure confirmed at military installation or fire department. One of the four qualifying PFAS-linked cancers confirmed. Occupational history and exposure duration documented. Not currently represented.
Hair RelaxerPhase 2 — Active

10,948 pending cases in MDL-3060 (N.D. Illinois). Adding 247 new cases per month. The plaintiff pool depth here is unlike any other active docket — millions of women have used chemical relaxers long-term, and the 2022 NIH study linking these products to uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer created a massive awareness event.

The April 2026 Daubert hearings on causation are the defining variable. If the court rules favorably for plaintiffs on the scientific causation standard, settlement discussions accelerate and plaintiff acquisition intensifies. If the ruling creates headwinds — if the causation experts are excluded or substantially limited — the docket’s trajectory changes.

Enter at moderate volume now. Have a scaling decision ready for the Daubert outcome. Favorable ruling: accelerate hard. Adverse ruling: pause and reassess.

What qualifies: Chemical hair relaxer use confirmed — 4+ years is the standard threshold. Uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, or endometrial cancer confirmed. Not currently represented.
GLP-1 / OzempicPhase 1–2 — Emerging

3,191 pending cases in MDL-3094 (E.D. Pennsylvania). Growing 130% year-over-year. A new JAMA study linking GLP-1 drugs to permanent vision loss (NAION) has expanded the potential plaintiff pool beyond the original gastroparesis and intestinal obstruction claims.

This is Phase 1–2. Case values are not established. Bellwether selection is expected mid-2026. Novo Nordisk has filed motions to dismiss that haven’t been resolved. The litigation could expand significantly — 31 million Americans use GLP-1 drugs — or could be substantially narrowed if the causation standards tighten.

The entry logic here is position-building, not volume scaling. Enter at modest spend on the highest-severity qualifying injuries — gastroparesis requiring hospitalization, intestinal obstruction, NAION vision loss. Build plaintiff inventory before the docket enters Phase 2 peak acquisition. If bellwether selection in mid-2026 goes well, you scale from a position of established infrastructure and existing buyer relationships.

Don’t put $50,000/month into Ozempic leads today. Put $10,000/month in, build the system, and have the scale capacity ready when the data justifies it.

What qualifies: GLP-1 drug use confirmed — Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy, or Rybelsus. Qualifying injury with hospitalization: gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction, ileus, or documented NAION vision loss. Not currently represented.
NEC Baby FormulaPhase 2 — Enter

750+ federal cases. Bellwether trials scheduled August 2026, November 2026, and February 2027.

This is the most time-sensitive entry window in the current docket landscape. Pre-bellwether is peak acquisition phase for a reason: once the first bellwether verdict establishes case values, the settlement framework begins taking shape and plaintiff acquisition intensifies across every firm in the MDL simultaneously. The cost to acquire plaintiffs post-verdict is substantially higher than pre-verdict.

The claim: Abbott’s Similac and Mead Johnson’s Enfamil — cow’s milk-based formula administered to premature infants in NICUs — caused necrotizing enterocolitis, a severe intestinal disease that killed or permanently injured those infants. The damages in severe NEC outcomes are significant: wrongful death, long-term disability, bowel resection. Strong cases.

You have until August 2026 to enter before the first bellwether verdict changes the economics. After that, you’re competing in peak Phase 2 against every firm that entered pre-verdict.

What qualifies: Premature birth confirmed. Cow’s milk-based NICU formula confirmed — Similac or Enfamil specifically. NEC diagnosis documented. Parent or guardian filing on behalf of injured infant. Not currently represented.
MesotheliomaEvergreen

No MDL closing date. No settlement deadline. No acquisition window that closes.

Mesothelioma is the one mass tort docket that doesn’t follow the phase lifecycle, because asbestos exposure from decades ago is still producing new diagnoses every year. The plaintiff population is steady. The case values are the highest in mass tort — settlements frequently exceed $1,000,000 for mesothelioma with documented asbestos exposure history.

The qualification bar is high. Mesothelioma diagnosis confirmed — not lung cancer, not asbestosis, mesothelioma. Exposure history to asbestos documented. SOL verified under the discovery rule running from diagnosis date.

If you have the intake infrastructure to handle mesothelioma leads — longer time-to-retainer, medical record verification, nuanced exposure history documentation — this is the one docket where sustained multi-year investment makes sense regardless of MDL timing.

What qualifies: Mesothelioma diagnosis confirmed. Asbestos exposure documented. Discovery rule SOL verified from diagnosis date. Not currently represented.
RoundupPhase 3 — Don’t Enter Fresh

4,464 pending cases in the MDL. 170,000+ total cases filed. Bayer has paid $11 billion across approximately 100,000 settled cases.

This is Phase 3. The plaintiff class is substantially aggregated. Acquisition costs are at their highest. Buyer demand from firms best positioned to settle existing cases is contracting, not growing. The Missouri Supreme Court finalized a $600 million judgment in early 2026 — which creates settlement pressure but also signals the litigation is heading toward conclusion, not expansion.

If you are already running Roundup campaigns with active buyers and established economics: continue. Don’t build new infrastructure for this docket. Don’t enter fresh. The firms that captured Roundup economics captured them in 2019–2022.

Camp LejeuneCLOSED

The Camp Lejeune Justice Act required claims to be submitted by August 10, 2024. That deadline has passed.

Any Camp Lejeune lead generated after August 2024 is worthless. The claimant cannot file. No law firm with knowledge of the MDL status will buy that lead. If your current vendor is still running Camp Lejeune acquisition campaigns, they either don’t know the deadline passed or they know and are selling you unusable product either way.

Stop immediately. Find a new vendor.

03

Three Questions Before You Enter Any New Docket

New dockets emerge constantly. The GLP-1 litigation didn’t exist three years ago. Depo-Provera consolidated in 2025. Something will emerge in 2026 that isn’t on this page yet. When it does, run these three questions before committing a dollar.

01
Can you model the plaintiff value?
If no bellwether outcomes exist and settlement range is entirely speculative, you’re operating without a CPR floor. That doesn’t mean don’t enter — it means enter small until the data exists to justify scale.
02
Are law firms actively writing checks for plaintiffs today?
Not “they expressed interest.” Not “they said they’re evaluating it.” Are they currently paying per signed retainer, on a defined cycle, for qualified plaintiffs in this specific docket? Active payment is the only proof the economics are real.
03
Is the MDL building toward peak acquisition or winding down toward resolution?
A docket heading into bellwether trials is in peak acquisition phase. A docket in active settlement negotiation is late Phase 3. The entry economics differ by 12–18 months of timeline and frequently by 3–4x on CPR.

The firms that build real wealth in mass tort are not the ones with the best creative. They’re the ones who get the phase right, build fast, and exit before the market prices them out.

Timing is the product. Everything else is execution.

04

Frequently Asked Questions

Four signals, in order of urgency. First: dollar amounts and plaintiff ranges appear in legal trade press tied to specific mediator appointments. Second: major plaintiff law firms stop advertising in that docket category. Third: per-lead prices at the vendor level start dropping as buyer demand exits. Fourth: federal MDL administrative orders restrict new plaintiff additions or set hard filing cutoffs. Any one of these signals warrants reducing volume. All four means exit immediately — that day, not that week.
Not yet — but the window is shorter than it was 12 months ago. Municipal settlements exceeding $12 billion have created pressure for individual plaintiff global settlement. If you enter AFFF now, define your exit trigger before you spend the first dollar: what specific MDL development causes you to stop buying? Name it. Write it down. Commit to it. Then enter.
Monthly at minimum. A single bellwether verdict, a Daubert ruling on causation, or a global settlement announcement can change a docket’s economics within weeks. Quarterly review is not enough. Any mass tort vendor who doesn’t proactively brief you on docket status changes affecting your active campaigns is not running a docket-aware operation.
Enough to build real infrastructure and establish buyer relationships — not enough to hurt if the litigation underperforms. For most firms, that’s $8,000–$15,000 per month into an emerging docket, with defined scale triggers tied to bellwether outcomes. The goal at Phase 1–2 is position, not volume. You scale volume when Phase 2 confirms the economics.
Because case value is fixed by the litigation. Entry economics are controlled by timing. Two firms entering the same docket — one in early Phase 2, one in late Phase 3 — will see the same case values at settlement. But the early entrant paid $2,800 CPR. The late entrant paid $7,400 CPR. The case value didn’t change. The timing did. Every dollar difference in CPR across a 20-retainer-per-month volume compounds to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. Get the timing right and the economics work at every docket tier. Get it wrong and no case value justifies the acquisition cost.

The firms that entered Roundup in 2019 made money. The firms that entered in 2024 paid for the lesson.

Depo-Provera is 2019 Roundup right now. So is NEC Formula.

The window is open. It won’t be forever.

Enter the Right Docket. At the Right Phase.

Docket-specific leads for active MDLs. We brief you on status monthly. When a docket closes, we stop — that day.

0 leads delivered this week — 38 states active.

Book a Call